Skip to main content

Long Beach city government - Google News

Open Government - Google News

Schipske Asks City Attorney to Halt Destruction of Elected Officials' Records

Councilmember Gerrie Schipske
Councilmember Gerrie Schipske (Photo credit: Long Beach Public Library)
Schipske Asks City Attorney to Halt Destruction of Elected Officials’ Records – Says City Ordinance Requires Records to be Retained by the City When Officials Leave

May 11, 2014 – Outgoing Fifth District Councilwoman Gerrie Schipske today announced that she has contacted City Attorney, Charles Parkin, to seek clarification about why she received a memorandum from the City Clerk regarding the planned destruction of her office records from 2006 – 2009.
“When I took office all the records had been destroyed so I authored an ordinance passed by the City Council that requires that the records of outgoing elected officials not be destroyed,” reminds Schipske. “Last week I received a memo indicating that my records from 2006-2009 were planned for destruction. I have to assume all other elected officials received the same memo and so I put in a call to the City Attorney to ask what was going on in light of the City ordinance.”
To date, the outgoing elected officials have not received instruction as to what records need to be kept when they leave City hall.
“Since emails are considered public records, I would think that they need to be maintained as well,” cautions Schipske. “Some cities require that a printed copy of emails conducting government business need to be retained in a file so that if emails are purged from the system there is still a public record of the correspondence.” Schipske notes that her office routinely cuts and pastes emails from constituents into a master data base that includes a complete history of contacts since she took office in 2006.
Schipske adds that until this issue gets clarified, “the City Attorney needs to halt the destruction of all records in Council Districts 1,3,5,7,9 and the office of the Mayor. Otherwise the public will be denied access to these records and those who take these offices will have to start from scratch. Most importantly, a City ordinance will have been violated.”

#30
Enhanced by Zemanta

Popular posts from this blog

Sign the Petition -- Repeal Officeholder Accounts in Long Beach

Sign the Petition to Stop Political Slush Funds in Long Beach
The Long Beach Mayor and City Council have totally changed the purpose of "officeholder accounts" by voting to triple the amounts they can raise and by voting to allow the transfer of the officeholder accounts to political campaigns. The voters of the City of Long Beach enacted campaign finance reform back in 1994 to try and stem the flow of special interest money into local elections and to "allow candidates and officeholders to spend a lesser proportion of their time on fund raising and a greater proportion of their time dealing with issues of importance to their constituents." A measure should be placed on the ballot that allows voters to repeal officeholder accounts so elected officials can get back to spending time representing their constituents, instead of doing year-round fundraising.

Article Discusses the Tyrannies of Local Government

It is ironic that last night the City Council without any dissent, passed the City Budget in record time (even before all council districts were able to hold public meetings on the budget) ignoring the continued concerns of many residents about the lack of adequate police services particularly in and around City parks and today an article (http://www.newrepublic.com/article/119249/fergusons-lesson-local-government-poses-real-threat-liberty) appears in The Nation titled: The Greatest Threat to Our Liberty Is Local Governments Run Amok.
The article rightly points out with the lack of strong local media watchdogs and elections that are bought by special interests, local elected officials have developed political monopolies and enact proposals that do not reflect the concerns of their constituents: 
Political scientist Jessica Trounstine calls “political monopoly”—officials and organizations who have so effectively defeated any potential predators that they can lazily begin to gorge. She …

Why Mayor Garcia Won't Veto the Bad Ordinance on Office Holder Accounts

By the time this is published, the deadline to veto the recently passed office holder account ordinance will have passed and it will have become law.
The ordinance allows council members, the Mayor, City Prosecutor, City Attorney and City Auditor, to raise funds for their "office holder accounts" and then to contribute those funds to other political campaigns.
Mayor Robert Garcia should have vetoed this very bad law, but he didn't.
Here's why.
The voters of the City of Long Beach enacted campaign finance reform back in 1994 to try and stem the flow of special interest money into local elections and to "allow candidates and officeholders to spend a lesser proportion of their time on fund raising and a greater proportion of their time dealing with issues of importance to their constituents."
The Long Beach Campaign Reform Act was the brain-child of the Long Beach Area Citizens Involved (LBACI that also moved the City to form council districts instead of elec…