Skip to main content

Long Beach city government - Google News

Open Government - Google News

Schipske Asks City Attorney to Halt Destruction of Elected Officials' Records

Councilmember Gerrie Schipske
Councilmember Gerrie Schipske (Photo credit: Long Beach Public Library)
Schipske Asks City Attorney to Halt Destruction of Elected Officials’ Records – Says City Ordinance Requires Records to be Retained by the City When Officials Leave

May 11, 2014 – Outgoing Fifth District Councilwoman Gerrie Schipske today announced that she has contacted City Attorney, Charles Parkin, to seek clarification about why she received a memorandum from the City Clerk regarding the planned destruction of her office records from 2006 – 2009.
“When I took office all the records had been destroyed so I authored an ordinance passed by the City Council that requires that the records of outgoing elected officials not be destroyed,” reminds Schipske. “Last week I received a memo indicating that my records from 2006-2009 were planned for destruction. I have to assume all other elected officials received the same memo and so I put in a call to the City Attorney to ask what was going on in light of the City ordinance.”
To date, the outgoing elected officials have not received instruction as to what records need to be kept when they leave City hall.
“Since emails are considered public records, I would think that they need to be maintained as well,” cautions Schipske. “Some cities require that a printed copy of emails conducting government business need to be retained in a file so that if emails are purged from the system there is still a public record of the correspondence.” Schipske notes that her office routinely cuts and pastes emails from constituents into a master data base that includes a complete history of contacts since she took office in 2006.
Schipske adds that until this issue gets clarified, “the City Attorney needs to halt the destruction of all records in Council Districts 1,3,5,7,9 and the office of the Mayor. Otherwise the public will be denied access to these records and those who take these offices will have to start from scratch. Most importantly, a City ordinance will have been violated.”

Enhanced by Zemanta

Popular posts from this blog

Four Taxpayers Step Up To Oppose The Taking of Utility Revenues

Four Long Beach taxpayers stepped up this month to write arguments in opposition to Measure M which will appear on the June ballot. (Click here to read more about Measure M)

The Measure asks voters to approve a 12% transfer of gross revenues of the City's natural gas, water and sewer utilities.

Tom Stout, Joe Weinstein, Diana Lejins and Gerrie Schipske submitted a 300 word argument in opposition to Measure M that outlines why the tax measure should be defeated:

Dear Voter,

VOTE NO. STOP THIS BLATANT MONEY GRAB. The Mayor and Council are spending more than one-half million dollars of your taxes to put this measure on the ballot. Special interests will spend hundreds of thousands in support. Why? The Mayor and Council were caught taking millions of dollars in illegal fees from the Water Department’s sewer and water pipeline budget. They raised your sewer and water bills to pay for the illegal fees. A brave taxpayer stopped them. She filed a lawsuit which forced the City to return …

Sign the Petition -- Repeal Officeholder Accounts in Long Beach

Sign the Petition to Stop Political Slush Funds in Long Beach
The Long Beach Mayor and City Council have totally changed the purpose of "officeholder accounts" by voting to triple the amounts they can raise and by voting to allow the transfer of the officeholder accounts to political campaigns. The voters of the City of Long Beach enacted campaign finance reform back in 1994 to try and stem the flow of special interest money into local elections and to "allow candidates and officeholders to spend a lesser proportion of their time on fund raising and a greater proportion of their time dealing with issues of importance to their constituents." A measure should be placed on the ballot that allows voters to repeal officeholder accounts so elected officials can get back to spending time representing their constituents, instead of doing year-round fundraising.

Things They Need to Tell Us Before They Lease Community Hospital

By: Gerrie Schipske, Author of “Historical Hospitals of Long Beach”
Before everyone gets too excited over the announced possibilities of a new operator of Community Hospital, taxpayers need to be aware that the City of Long Beach owns the deed to the property on which Long Beach Community Hospital sits. 
The actual deed has a restrictive covenant that only allows the property to be used for a “public hospital.” This is because the taxpayers paid for the land and then raised millions of dollars through bonds to pay for the construction and expansion on several occasions. Also, the City even gave money directly to keep the hospital operating. The City holds title to the property.
Historically, the hospital has been operated by the Long Beach Community Hospital Association and then Healthwest, UniHealth, Catholic HealthCare, the Community Hospital Foundation and most recently Memorial Medical.
Memorial is ending its lease because it cannot (or will not) retrofit the hospital to meet state e…