Skip to main content

Long Beach city government - Google News

Open Government - Google News

Foster and the Gang of 8 Should Be Ashamed

Local resident Terry Jensen took up where I left off criticizing the proposed tear down and rebuild of City Hall and the Main Library -- not to mention the give away of the public parking structure and the vacant courthouse.

As reported in, ( the City has flatly refused to provide the documentation for all the assertions made in the memo which the Council relied upon when it decided to put the Civic Center out for bid. To date no one has provided documentation of where estimates of the costs to retrofit were obtained.

Not one city in California has torn down its City Hall due to seismic problems. Not one. They have all retro fitted their buildings.

No one in Long Beach can explain that if the building is so seismically unsafe, why is it still occupied. And no one has even discussed that a great portion of the "costs to run the Civic Center" are actually parking lot costs which are fully recovered and why if that is the case is the City planning on giving the parking lot to the developer.

Foster and the gang of eight council members that  railroaded this looming fiasco through council should be ashamed. What an embarrassing action to take as Foster and five of the council leave office. And at a time when Foster and the same gang have refused to restore the Fire Engines taken out of several stations, they agreed to spend several million on consultants to put an RFP together and to reward firms responding, even if the City decides to cancel the plan for a new civic center.

All the documents need to be released. More importantly, this project needs to be stopped so no more funds are expended until an investigation is done about what really is going on and who will benefit if this project is approved.

Enhanced by Zemanta

Popular posts from this blog

Four Taxpayers Step Up To Oppose The Taking of Utility Revenues

Four Long Beach taxpayers stepped up this month to write arguments in opposition to Measure M which will appear on the June ballot. (Click here to read more about Measure M)

The Measure asks voters to approve a 12% transfer of gross revenues of the City's natural gas, water and sewer utilities.

Tom Stout, Joe Weinstein, Diana Lejins and Gerrie Schipske submitted a 300 word argument in opposition to Measure M that outlines why the tax measure should be defeated:

Dear Voter,

VOTE NO. STOP THIS BLATANT MONEY GRAB. The Mayor and Council are spending more than one-half million dollars of your taxes to put this measure on the ballot. Special interests will spend hundreds of thousands in support. Why? The Mayor and Council were caught taking millions of dollars in illegal fees from the Water Department’s sewer and water pipeline budget. They raised your sewer and water bills to pay for the illegal fees. A brave taxpayer stopped them. She filed a lawsuit which forced the City to return …

Sign the Petition -- Repeal Officeholder Accounts in Long Beach

Sign the Petition to Stop Political Slush Funds in Long Beach
The Long Beach Mayor and City Council have totally changed the purpose of "officeholder accounts" by voting to triple the amounts they can raise and by voting to allow the transfer of the officeholder accounts to political campaigns. The voters of the City of Long Beach enacted campaign finance reform back in 1994 to try and stem the flow of special interest money into local elections and to "allow candidates and officeholders to spend a lesser proportion of their time on fund raising and a greater proportion of their time dealing with issues of importance to their constituents." A measure should be placed on the ballot that allows voters to repeal officeholder accounts so elected officials can get back to spending time representing their constituents, instead of doing year-round fundraising.

Things They Need to Tell Us Before They Lease Community Hospital

By: Gerrie Schipske, Author of “Historical Hospitals of Long Beach”
Before everyone gets too excited over the announced possibilities of a new operator of Community Hospital, taxpayers need to be aware that the City of Long Beach owns the deed to the property on which Long Beach Community Hospital sits. 
The actual deed has a restrictive covenant that only allows the property to be used for a “public hospital.” This is because the taxpayers paid for the land and then raised millions of dollars through bonds to pay for the construction and expansion on several occasions. Also, the City even gave money directly to keep the hospital operating. The City holds title to the property.
Historically, the hospital has been operated by the Long Beach Community Hospital Association and then Healthwest, UniHealth, Catholic HealthCare, the Community Hospital Foundation and most recently Memorial Medical.
Memorial is ending its lease because it cannot (or will not) retrofit the hospital to meet state e…