Skip to main content

Long Beach city government - Google News

Open Government - Google News

RFQ for Civic Center Doesn't Even Ask for Firms to Fix Seismic Problems

Agenda Item Approving Request for Qualifications  – Led Public to Believe that RFQ Was Necessary to Deal with Seismic Issues Related to City Hall -- RFQ Fails To Ask For Any Firm to Retrofit, Repurpose or Rehab – Only Asks for Teardown and Rebuild

Long Beach, CA – June 30, 2013-- Despite being told at a February 12 meeting, that a Request for Qualifications would help the City deal with the seismic issues related to City Hall, nothing was included in the actual document that calls for firms to retrofit, repurpose or rehab the current facility, says Councilwoman Gerrie Schipske. 

“I voted for the RFQ on the basis that we would be able to find firms to help us deal with any seismic problems. Nothing is contained in the RFQ that calls for that.”

Schipske also notes that Council directed City management to have a “peer review” or second study done of the first and only seismic assessment done on the Civic Center in 2005 as FEMA guidelines have changed and the Civic Center is not considered an essential building.

“This hasn’t happened and it is key to what the City needs to do. If an updated assessment indicates that the buildings can be retrofitted and repurposed then we don’t have to tear down and rebuild which would save the taxpayers a considerable amount of money,” notes Schipske.

Schipske is concerned that the “train has left the station” and that taxpayers were not allowed “on board.”

“Let’s get a real assessment of the needs and costs for seismic retrofit for the Civic Center before we begin encumbering taxpayers with debt for new structures that may not be needed.”

Link to council meeting discussing this issue: http://longbeach.granicus.com/MediaPlayer.php?view_id=&clip_id=6285&meta_id=450171

Enhanced by Zemanta

Popular posts from this blog

Sign the Petition -- Repeal Officeholder Accounts in Long Beach

Sign the Petition to Stop Political Slush Funds in Long Beach
The Long Beach Mayor and City Council have totally changed the purpose of "officeholder accounts" by voting to triple the amounts they can raise and by voting to allow the transfer of the officeholder accounts to political campaigns. The voters of the City of Long Beach enacted campaign finance reform back in 1994 to try and stem the flow of special interest money into local elections and to "allow candidates and officeholders to spend a lesser proportion of their time on fund raising and a greater proportion of their time dealing with issues of importance to their constituents." A measure should be placed on the ballot that allows voters to repeal officeholder accounts so elected officials can get back to spending time representing their constituents, instead of doing year-round fundraising.

Article Discusses the Tyrannies of Local Government

It is ironic that last night the City Council without any dissent, passed the City Budget in record time (even before all council districts were able to hold public meetings on the budget) ignoring the continued concerns of many residents about the lack of adequate police services particularly in and around City parks and today an article (http://www.newrepublic.com/article/119249/fergusons-lesson-local-government-poses-real-threat-liberty) appears in The Nation titled: The Greatest Threat to Our Liberty Is Local Governments Run Amok.
The article rightly points out with the lack of strong local media watchdogs and elections that are bought by special interests, local elected officials have developed political monopolies and enact proposals that do not reflect the concerns of their constituents: 
Political scientist Jessica Trounstine calls “political monopoly”—officials and organizations who have so effectively defeated any potential predators that they can lazily begin to gorge. She …

Why Mayor Garcia Won't Veto the Bad Ordinance on Office Holder Accounts

By the time this is published, the deadline to veto the recently passed office holder account ordinance will have passed and it will have become law.
The ordinance allows council members, the Mayor, City Prosecutor, City Attorney and City Auditor, to raise funds for their "office holder accounts" and then to contribute those funds to other political campaigns.
Mayor Robert Garcia should have vetoed this very bad law, but he didn't.
Here's why.
The voters of the City of Long Beach enacted campaign finance reform back in 1994 to try and stem the flow of special interest money into local elections and to "allow candidates and officeholders to spend a lesser proportion of their time on fund raising and a greater proportion of their time dealing with issues of importance to their constituents."
The Long Beach Campaign Reform Act was the brain-child of the Long Beach Area Citizens Involved (LBACI that also moved the City to form council districts instead of elec…