Skip to main content

Long Beach city government - Google News

Open Government - Google News

RFQ for Civic Center Doesn't Even Ask for Firms to Fix Seismic Problems

Agenda Item Approving Request for Qualifications  – Led Public to Believe that RFQ Was Necessary to Deal with Seismic Issues Related to City Hall -- RFQ Fails To Ask For Any Firm to Retrofit, Repurpose or Rehab – Only Asks for Teardown and Rebuild

Long Beach, CA – June 30, 2013-- Despite being told at a February 12 meeting, that a Request for Qualifications would help the City deal with the seismic issues related to City Hall, nothing was included in the actual document that calls for firms to retrofit, repurpose or rehab the current facility, says Councilwoman Gerrie Schipske. 

“I voted for the RFQ on the basis that we would be able to find firms to help us deal with any seismic problems. Nothing is contained in the RFQ that calls for that.”

Schipske also notes that Council directed City management to have a “peer review” or second study done of the first and only seismic assessment done on the Civic Center in 2005 as FEMA guidelines have changed and the Civic Center is not considered an essential building.

“This hasn’t happened and it is key to what the City needs to do. If an updated assessment indicates that the buildings can be retrofitted and repurposed then we don’t have to tear down and rebuild which would save the taxpayers a considerable amount of money,” notes Schipske.

Schipske is concerned that the “train has left the station” and that taxpayers were not allowed “on board.”

“Let’s get a real assessment of the needs and costs for seismic retrofit for the Civic Center before we begin encumbering taxpayers with debt for new structures that may not be needed.”

Link to council meeting discussing this issue:

Enhanced by Zemanta

Popular posts from this blog

Four Taxpayers Step Up To Oppose The Taking of Utility Revenues

Four Long Beach taxpayers stepped up this month to write arguments in opposition to Measure M which will appear on the June ballot. (Click here to read more about Measure M)

The Measure asks voters to approve a 12% transfer of gross revenues of the City's natural gas, water and sewer utilities.

Tom Stout, Joe Weinstein, Diana Lejins and Gerrie Schipske submitted a 300 word argument in opposition to Measure M that outlines why the tax measure should be defeated:

Dear Voter,

VOTE NO. STOP THIS BLATANT MONEY GRAB. The Mayor and Council are spending more than one-half million dollars of your taxes to put this measure on the ballot. Special interests will spend hundreds of thousands in support. Why? The Mayor and Council were caught taking millions of dollars in illegal fees from the Water Department’s sewer and water pipeline budget. They raised your sewer and water bills to pay for the illegal fees. A brave taxpayer stopped them. She filed a lawsuit which forced the City to return …

Sign the Petition -- Repeal Officeholder Accounts in Long Beach

Sign the Petition to Stop Political Slush Funds in Long Beach
The Long Beach Mayor and City Council have totally changed the purpose of "officeholder accounts" by voting to triple the amounts they can raise and by voting to allow the transfer of the officeholder accounts to political campaigns. The voters of the City of Long Beach enacted campaign finance reform back in 1994 to try and stem the flow of special interest money into local elections and to "allow candidates and officeholders to spend a lesser proportion of their time on fund raising and a greater proportion of their time dealing with issues of importance to their constituents." A measure should be placed on the ballot that allows voters to repeal officeholder accounts so elected officials can get back to spending time representing their constituents, instead of doing year-round fundraising.

Things They Need to Tell Us Before They Lease Community Hospital

By: Gerrie Schipske, Author of “Historical Hospitals of Long Beach”
Before everyone gets too excited over the announced possibilities of a new operator of Community Hospital, taxpayers need to be aware that the City of Long Beach owns the deed to the property on which Long Beach Community Hospital sits. 
The actual deed has a restrictive covenant that only allows the property to be used for a “public hospital.” This is because the taxpayers paid for the land and then raised millions of dollars through bonds to pay for the construction and expansion on several occasions. Also, the City even gave money directly to keep the hospital operating. The City holds title to the property.
Historically, the hospital has been operated by the Long Beach Community Hospital Association and then Healthwest, UniHealth, Catholic HealthCare, the Community Hospital Foundation and most recently Memorial Medical.
Memorial is ending its lease because it cannot (or will not) retrofit the hospital to meet state e…