Skip to main content

Long Beach city government - Google News

Open Government - Google News

Schipske Proposes Specific Use of Funds to Restore Cuts -- Says Oil Revenues May Be Underestimated

Gerrie Schipske at Ruth Bach LibraryGerrie Schipske at Ruth Bach Library (Photo credit: Long Beach Public Library)Schipske Proposes Restoring Specific Budget Cuts -- Keeping Our City Safe

Following a packed budget meeting in the 5th Council district where residents came to listen about proposed cuts to the City budget and to discuss their concerns about the impact of the cuts,
Councilwoman Gerrie Schipske has compiled a listing of how a great deal of the these cuts can be restored by using the $17 million dollars that are excess from oil, refuse/street sweeping and state reimbursement for paramedic services.

"The residents have clearly spoken that they do not want police, fire, recreation and libraries cut while $17 million dollars sits as 'surplus'," says Schipske. "No one is proposing starting up new programs. What is being proposed is fixing those services and programs that make this city a safe, quality place in which to live and to work."

Schipske points out that the documents indicating the cuts fail to include what would be needed to keep yet another fire engine from being taken out of service.

 "The entire focus in fire is about a pilot project that may not be approved by LA County Emergency Medical Services and repairing fire stations to make gender accommodations. The real issue should have been detailed for the City Council about how we are destroying the ability of our fire service to respond because we are browning out our stations and taking equipment and staff off service. How much would it cost to restore that? No body was given the figures. So I couldn't put it on my list, but will once we get the details."

Schipske says her proposals restore services instead of spending $7 million on a "down payment" on new software systems. "I also think that $1 million (instead of $4) this year is enough to start repairing the fire stations. As we get more funds then we can budget to complete the rest of the facilities."

"I also do not believe that the amount indicated as 'oil surplus' is accurate," says Schipske who has extensively researched the issue of the city's oil revenues. She points out that the FY 2013 budget lists an "oil surplus" of $10.8 million yet last year the city had a surplus of almost $18 million. "This year oil production was up and the price of crude oil fluctuated all year long between $80 and $125 a barrel. There should be a lot more money coming our way."

During her presentation at her budget meeting, Schipske described the cuts being proposed as "disproportionately impacting the east side of Long Beach."

"Recreational programming in every one of the parks in the 5th district is being eliminated. The only swimming pool on this side of town is being closed in the summer. We lost a fire engine from Station 18 last year and response times for emergency medical services is up due to reduced staffing. Our two library branches -- which serve the students of over 20 public and private schools in the 5th -- are being constantly cut back. Sidewalk repair funds are being cut -- and the 5th has the most sidewalks in the city. Park Ranger patrols are being reduced to only one park, and only 3 days a week and the 5th has the most parks. Crime is up here. We need more police. That is why it makes no sense to cut these services and use available funds for other projects. The economy is improving -- our sales tax revenue is up and so is property tax revenue. The price of crude oil remains high. We need to be cautious and I believe restoring these cuts as my residents and I have set out, does just that."

Date: August 21, 2012
From: Councilwoman Gerrie Schipske, Fifth District
Subject: Recommendations concerning disbursement of “surplus” funds

DISCUSSION: Following up with a community budget meeting in the 5th Council District and the input given by residents on line at: it is recommended that the “surplus” funds be distributed in the following manner:

Restore the gang and other specialized details in the police department: $3.8 m
Restore support services for the police department: $2.3 m
Fund the police academy and transport vans: $3.1 m
Reduce funding for repair of fire stations to: $1 m
Restore youth sports and after school programs: $1.2 m
Restore swimming pools: $63,000
Restore El Dorado Nature Center, Adaptive Recreation and Senior Center programming: $364,000
Restore a portion of the funding for Library Services: $400,000
Restore sidewalk repair money: $1 m
Fund infrastructure repair of park facilities: $1 m
Fund reserves: $1 m
Invest in software/systems necessary to improve human resources management/billing/collections: $2 m
Total: $18 million (with assumption that oil monies have been underestimated)

These recommendations restore core services that provide public safety and quality of life for our residents.
Enhanced by Zemanta

Popular posts from this blog

Sign the Petition -- Repeal Officeholder Accounts in Long Beach

Sign the Petition to Stop Political Slush Funds in Long Beach
The Long Beach Mayor and City Council have totally changed the purpose of "officeholder accounts" by voting to triple the amounts they can raise and by voting to allow the transfer of the officeholder accounts to political campaigns. The voters of the City of Long Beach enacted campaign finance reform back in 1994 to try and stem the flow of special interest money into local elections and to "allow candidates and officeholders to spend a lesser proportion of their time on fund raising and a greater proportion of their time dealing with issues of importance to their constituents." A measure should be placed on the ballot that allows voters to repeal officeholder accounts so elected officials can get back to spending time representing their constituents, instead of doing year-round fundraising.

Article Discusses the Tyrannies of Local Government

It is ironic that last night the City Council without any dissent, passed the City Budget in record time (even before all council districts were able to hold public meetings on the budget) ignoring the continued concerns of many residents about the lack of adequate police services particularly in and around City parks and today an article ( appears in The Nation titled: The Greatest Threat to Our Liberty Is Local Governments Run Amok.
The article rightly points out with the lack of strong local media watchdogs and elections that are bought by special interests, local elected officials have developed political monopolies and enact proposals that do not reflect the concerns of their constituents: 
Political scientist Jessica Trounstine calls “political monopoly”—officials and organizations who have so effectively defeated any potential predators that they can lazily begin to gorge. She …

Why Mayor Garcia Won't Veto the Bad Ordinance on Office Holder Accounts

By the time this is published, the deadline to veto the recently passed office holder account ordinance will have passed and it will have become law.
The ordinance allows council members, the Mayor, City Prosecutor, City Attorney and City Auditor, to raise funds for their "office holder accounts" and then to contribute those funds to other political campaigns.
Mayor Robert Garcia should have vetoed this very bad law, but he didn't.
Here's why.
The voters of the City of Long Beach enacted campaign finance reform back in 1994 to try and stem the flow of special interest money into local elections and to "allow candidates and officeholders to spend a lesser proportion of their time on fund raising and a greater proportion of their time dealing with issues of importance to their constituents."
The Long Beach Campaign Reform Act was the brain-child of the Long Beach Area Citizens Involved (LBACI that also moved the City to form council districts instead of elec…