Skip to main content

Long Beach city government - Google News

Open Government - Google News

Many City Employees Hit $100,000 Level -- Time to Move to Zero Based Budgeting


The City needs to grapple with the problems outlined in the Long Beach Business Journal on $100,000 employee positions. The article touts the Mayor and management as being the only movers on the issue of pension reform. However, to think that any pension reforms came without the complete support of the City Council (remember we are still a Council-Manager form of government) is dishonest. All city employees need to pay their share of the pension costs -- including management -- a fact I pointed out during budget meetings and was told by the Mayor that my calling for them to pay their share of pension costs was "class warfare."

The rhetoric needs to stop. Threatening a ballot measure to exact additional pension reform and that would be found unenforceable -- which the City Attorney has reminded several times -- may make some feel good but will not bring the results touted. Instead of chest pounding, the City needs real structural changes in the way we budget and spend money.

The only way we are really going to get any budget reform is to utilize a "zero based" budgeting process -- requiring every department to start from zero each budget year and build the budget by need and not simply add on to the previous budget. In theory, the organization’s entire budget needs to be justified and approved, rather than just the incremental change from the prior year. We need to stop making last year’s budget the starting point for the next budget. Zero based budgeting also allows the city to layout different levels of service so that real choices can be made as to what the city should and can afford to provide. It also helps answer the question: which services should really be funded? Instead of the usual answer: we should fund the ones we funded the year before, it makes elected and managers fund those services that are needed and justifiable.

Zero based budgeting takes considerable work to implement – which is the biggest argument against it. Also managers are reluctant to recommend lower budgets than what they currently oversee. It also uncovers “special funds” tucked away that don’t show up in the current budgets.

The City also has to be completely transparent about how we spend money throughout the year. When I suggested that we do as many other cities and states do – post their monthly or quarterly expenditures – it was met with stiff opposition. It is the money of the taxpayer we are spending and I think they have the right to see our checkbook.

Unless the City of Long Beach is serious about real structural change and on-going transparency, you will read about more and more employees earning $100,000 while City core services are being cut.

Popular posts from this blog

Four Taxpayers Step Up To Oppose The Taking of Utility Revenues

Four Long Beach taxpayers stepped up this month to write arguments in opposition to Measure M which will appear on the June ballot. (Click here to read more about Measure M)

The Measure asks voters to approve a 12% transfer of gross revenues of the City's natural gas, water and sewer utilities.

Tom Stout, Joe Weinstein, Diana Lejins and Gerrie Schipske submitted a 300 word argument in opposition to Measure M that outlines why the tax measure should be defeated:



Dear Voter,


VOTE NO. STOP THIS BLATANT MONEY GRAB. The Mayor and Council are spending more than one-half million dollars of your taxes to put this measure on the ballot. Special interests will spend hundreds of thousands in support. Why? The Mayor and Council were caught taking millions of dollars in illegal fees from the Water Department’s sewer and water pipeline budget. They raised your sewer and water bills to pay for the illegal fees. A brave taxpayer stopped them. She filed a lawsuit which forced the City to return …

Sign the Petition -- Repeal Officeholder Accounts in Long Beach

Sign the Petition to Stop Political Slush Funds in Long Beach
The Long Beach Mayor and City Council have totally changed the purpose of "officeholder accounts" by voting to triple the amounts they can raise and by voting to allow the transfer of the officeholder accounts to political campaigns. The voters of the City of Long Beach enacted campaign finance reform back in 1994 to try and stem the flow of special interest money into local elections and to "allow candidates and officeholders to spend a lesser proportion of their time on fund raising and a greater proportion of their time dealing with issues of importance to their constituents." A measure should be placed on the ballot that allows voters to repeal officeholder accounts so elected officials can get back to spending time representing their constituents, instead of doing year-round fundraising.

Things They Need to Tell Us Before They Lease Community Hospital

By: Gerrie Schipske, Author of “Historical Hospitals of Long Beach”
Before everyone gets too excited over the announced possibilities of a new operator of Community Hospital, taxpayers need to be aware that the City of Long Beach owns the deed to the property on which Long Beach Community Hospital sits. 
The actual deed has a restrictive covenant that only allows the property to be used for a “public hospital.” This is because the taxpayers paid for the land and then raised millions of dollars through bonds to pay for the construction and expansion on several occasions. Also, the City even gave money directly to keep the hospital operating. The City holds title to the property.
Historically, the hospital has been operated by the Long Beach Community Hospital Association and then Healthwest, UniHealth, Catholic HealthCare, the Community Hospital Foundation and most recently Memorial Medical.
Memorial is ending its lease because it cannot (or will not) retrofit the hospital to meet state e…