Skip to main content

Long Beach city government - Google News

Open Government - Google News

Schipske Challenges Local News Media to Host LB Budget Balancer

Los Angeles Times 3
Los Angeles Times 3 (Photo credit: jasoneppink)

Schipske Challenges Long Beach News Media to Host “Long Beach Budget Balancer”
– Says ‘It’s time we had everyone’s input on the City budget’
For Immediate Release
Contact: Office of Councilwoman Gerrie Schipske, 562 570-6932

               Long Beach, CA; April 20, 2012 – Councilwoman Gerrie Schipske today challenged the Long Beach news media to join the ranks of the Los Angeles Times, the New York Times, the MinnPost and the Cleveland Plain Dealer and other news outlets who host online budgeting tools that give readers the opportunity to help balance local governments’ budgets.
               “For the last two budget cycles, I have asked City management to obtain software that would allow all residents to give their direct input on how the City should balance its budget,” says Schipske, pointing out that several cities provide this online tool. “Management has informed me that the majority of the Council may not support this expenditure. So I am asking our local news media to take on the challenge of providing an online budgeting tool for their readers just as is provided by other news outlets.”
               Schipske points out that there are a number of online tools available at a reasonable cost. Input of budget information would need to be provided by City staff. These tools include:
·        Budget Allocator: Approximate cost: $4,000. http://bangthetable.com/products/budget-allocator/feature-tour/
·        Next10: Approximate cost: $15,000 (is used for the California Budget Project and by several cities). http://www.budgetchallenge.org/pages/home
·        User Voice: Approximate cost: $289 per month (is used by the City of Seattle). http://www.uservoice.com/
·        Peak Democracy: Approximate cost: $500 per month. http://www.peakdemocracy.com/how_it_works
·        Budget Simulator: Approximate cost: $4,000 – 6,000. http://www.budgetsimulator.com/info/

News outlets  and other sites offering these online budgeting tools include:
·        MinnPost: You Fix the Minnesota Deficit: http://www.minnpost.com/data/2011/02/you-fix-minnesota-deficit
·        Los Angeles Times: California Budget Balancer: http://www.latimes.com/news/local/budget/
·        Cleveland Plain Dealer: Try Your Hand at Closing the Gap: http://www.cleveland.com/open/index.ssf/2011/03/the_budget_widget_try_your_han.html
Mayor Annise Parker
Mayor Annise Parker (Photo credit: eschipul)
·        California Budget Challenge: http://www.budgetchallenge.org/pages/home
·        City of Houston: Budget Balancer: http://www.houstonbudgetbalancer.com/

               Schipske notes that hosting an online budgeting tool by the news media also sends a message to residents that the responses will be fully reported – “even if they are uncomfortable for local officials to read”.
#30
Enhanced by Zemanta

Popular posts from this blog

Sign the Petition -- Repeal Officeholder Accounts in Long Beach

Sign the Petition to Stop Political Slush Funds in Long Beach
The Long Beach Mayor and City Council have totally changed the purpose of "officeholder accounts" by voting to triple the amounts they can raise and by voting to allow the transfer of the officeholder accounts to political campaigns. The voters of the City of Long Beach enacted campaign finance reform back in 1994 to try and stem the flow of special interest money into local elections and to "allow candidates and officeholders to spend a lesser proportion of their time on fund raising and a greater proportion of their time dealing with issues of importance to their constituents." A measure should be placed on the ballot that allows voters to repeal officeholder accounts so elected officials can get back to spending time representing their constituents, instead of doing year-round fundraising.

Article Discusses the Tyrannies of Local Government

It is ironic that last night the City Council without any dissent, passed the City Budget in record time (even before all council districts were able to hold public meetings on the budget) ignoring the continued concerns of many residents about the lack of adequate police services particularly in and around City parks and today an article (http://www.newrepublic.com/article/119249/fergusons-lesson-local-government-poses-real-threat-liberty) appears in The Nation titled: The Greatest Threat to Our Liberty Is Local Governments Run Amok.
The article rightly points out with the lack of strong local media watchdogs and elections that are bought by special interests, local elected officials have developed political monopolies and enact proposals that do not reflect the concerns of their constituents: 
Political scientist Jessica Trounstine calls “political monopoly”—officials and organizations who have so effectively defeated any potential predators that they can lazily begin to gorge. She …

Why Mayor Garcia Won't Veto the Bad Ordinance on Office Holder Accounts

By the time this is published, the deadline to veto the recently passed office holder account ordinance will have passed and it will have become law.
The ordinance allows council members, the Mayor, City Prosecutor, City Attorney and City Auditor, to raise funds for their "office holder accounts" and then to contribute those funds to other political campaigns.
Mayor Robert Garcia should have vetoed this very bad law, but he didn't.
Here's why.
The voters of the City of Long Beach enacted campaign finance reform back in 1994 to try and stem the flow of special interest money into local elections and to "allow candidates and officeholders to spend a lesser proportion of their time on fund raising and a greater proportion of their time dealing with issues of importance to their constituents."
The Long Beach Campaign Reform Act was the brain-child of the Long Beach Area Citizens Involved (LBACI that also moved the City to form council districts instead of elec…